Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.

BACKGROUND: Several instruments have been designed to assess the childbirth experience. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is one of the most widely used tools. There is an improved version of this instrument, the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0), which has not been adapted or validated for use in Spain. The aim of present study is to adapt the CEQ 2.0 to the Spanish context and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS: This research was carried out in 2 stages. In the first stage, a methodological study was carried out in which the instrument was translated and back-translated, content validity was assessed by 10 experts (by calculating Aiken's V coefficient) and face validity was assessed in a sample of 30 postpartum women. In the second stage, a cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate construct validity by using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability evaluation (internal consistency and temporal stability) and validation by known groups. RESULTS: In Stage 1, a Spanish version of the CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0) was obtained with adequate face and content validity, with Aiken V scores greater than 0.70 for all items. A final sample of 500 women participated in Stage 2 of the study. The fit values for the obtained four-domain model were RMSEA = 0.038 [95% CI: 0.038-0.042], CFI = 0.989 [95% CI: 0.984-0.991], and GFI = 0.990 [95% CI: 0.982-0.991]. The overall Omega and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were 0.872 [95% CI: 0.850-0.891] and 0.870 [95% CI: 0.849-0.890] respectively. A coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.824 [95% CI: 0.314-0.936] (p ≤ 0.001) and a concordance coefficient of 0.694 [95% CI: 0.523-0.811] were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0), has adequate psychometric properties and is a valid, useful, and reliable instrument for assessing the childbirth experience in Spanish women.

Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Obstetric Violence Scale in the Spanish Context.

Obstetric violence refers to dehumanized or derogative treatment of women in their pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum periods and may be manifested in different ways. Currently, there is no tool validated in Spain to measure women's perception of obstetric violence. The objective of this study was to carry out the cultural adaptation and validation of an existing 14-item obstetric violence scale in the Spanish context and to evaluate its psychometric properties. The research was conducted in two phases: first, a methodological study designed to evaluate content validity, through assessments by eight experts (calculating the Aiken V coefficient) and face validity in a sample of 20 women; second, a cross-sectional study to evaluate construct validity (through confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis), divergent validity against a scale of birth satisfaction, known-groups validity and, finally, reliability. In Phase 1, Aiken V values higher than 0.71 were obtained for all items. Phase 2 was conducted on a sample of 256 women and the fit values for the unidimensional model were RMSEA: 0.070 (95% CI: 0.059-0.105) and GFI: 0.982 (95% CI: 0.823-0.990). The Rasch analysis indicated poor performance of item 2, which was removed. The Omega and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were 0.863 and 0.860, respectively. A final 13-item version of the Obstetric Violence Scale was produced, with a total score ranging from 0 (no obstetric violence perception) to 52 (maximum obstetric violence perception). The Obstetric Violence Scale is a reliable and useful tool to measure women's perception of obstetric violence. This study was not registered.

Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review.

The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people's satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals' health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses' interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.

Attitudes, capacities and perceived barriers in research of nurses of the Canary Health Service.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes, capacities and perceived barriers associated with research among nurses and midwives of the Canary Health Service (SCS). METHODS: Descriptive observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component carried out in the different SCS departments by means of an online survey in which sociodemographic and specific variables, the Spanish version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire (ATRDNQ-e) instrument and the BARRIERS scale were collected. Authorisation was obtained from the two provincial ethics committees. A descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test, post hoc contrast by Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligne test) was performed with JAMOVI® v.2.3.24 software. RESULTS: A total of 512 nurses and midwives with a mean age of 41.82 years participated in the study. Regarding the scores with the ATRDNQ-e instrument, the dimension with the lowest score was «Language of research¼ (mean = 3.55/SD = 0.84) and the highest «Assessment of nursing research and development of the nursing discipline¼ (mean = 4.54/SD = 0.52). The total mean score with the BARRIERS scale was 54.33 (SD = 16.52), with «Organizational characteristics¼ being the highest scoring subscale (mean = 17.25/SD = 5.90). The two highest perceived barriers were «Not enough time at work to implement new ideas¼ (mean = 2.55/SD = 1.11) and «Nursing does not have time to read research¼ (mean = 2.46/ SD = 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: SCS nurses have a positive attitude towards research, although there are some barriers where improvement actions for nursing research should be implemented.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale in the Spanish Context (PEMS-e).

Midwifery empowerment is an important topic. The most widely used instrument to measure the perceived empowerment of midwives is the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale (PEMS), which has not been validated in Spain. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the PEMS to the Spanish context. This research was carried out in two phases; Phase 1: Methodological study; translation, backtranslation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PEMS and pilot study on the target population (10 midwives) for evaluation of face validity. Phase 2: Cross-sectional observational study to obtain a sample for construct validation by Exploratory Factor Analysis and measurement of PEMS-e reliability. Additionally, an inferential analysis was carried out to study the possible association between several collected variables and PEMS-e subscale-scores. A total of 410 midwives from 18 Spanish regions participated in the study through an online questionnaire. An initial Spanish version of the PEMS scale was produced, demonstrating adequate face validity. A final model was produced for the PEMS-e, which included 17 items classified into two subscales ("Organizational support" and "Own skills and teamwork") with fit indexes RMSEA = 0.062 (95%CI: 0.048-0.065) and AGFI = 0.985 (95%CI: 0.983-0.989) and Cronbach's alpha 0.922 for the total scale. Results showed that one in four midwives had considered abandoning the profession in the last 6 months (p ≤ 0.001). This research suggests that Spanish midwives perceive their empowerment level as low. The PEMS-e is a valid tool with solid psychometric properties that can be used in future research to identify factors that contribute to increased empowerment among Spanish midwives and inform strategies to improve job satisfaction and retention in the profession.

Preferencias laborales de los estudiantes de Grado de Enfermería de la Universidad La Laguna / Job preferences of the Nursing Degree students at the La Laguna University

Introducción: Diversos estudios reflejan que determinadas áreas temáticas-clínicas despiertan mayor interés respecto a otras en los estudiantes de enfermería, lo cual repercute en las preferencias laborales de los recién graduados. Esto produce desequilibrios en las organizaciones sanitarias, imposibilitando cubrir determinados servicios. Objetivo: Identificar las preferencias laborales de los estudiantes de Enfermería de la Universidad de La Laguna según áreas temáticas clínicas una vez finalicen sus estudios de grado. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal, con componente analítico. La población a estudio estuvo compuesta por los estudiantes de 3º y 4º curso de Enfermería de la Universidad La Laguna. Se recogieron diferentes variables sociodemográficas, así como cuestiones sobre las preferencias laborales de los estudiantes. Se realizó mediante el programa estadístico IBM SPSS v19 un análisis descriptivo y un análisis inferencial (test estadístico X2 de Pearson o el estadístico de Fisher para las variables cualitativas y la prueba de T-Student para la comparación de medias para las cuantitativas) con el fin de explorar la asociación entre las distintas variables. Resultados: La muestra total fue de 153 estudiantes (n=153). La tasa de respuesta fue 53,50%. Las áreas más preferidas fueron Urgencias y Emergencias (Media=3,04±1,05) y Enfermería General (Media=2,54±0,96), mientras las menos favorables fueron “Otras Áreas (docencia-gestión investigación)” (Media=1,10±1,22) y Quirófano y Anestesia (Media=1,58±1,23). Conclusiones: Los estudiantes de enfermería mostraron una mayor disposición por trabajar en unas áreas respecto a otras. Es necesario generar nuevas estrategias con el fin de mejorar la atracción de los estudiantes de enfermería hacia determinadas áreas clínicas. (AU)

Introduction: Several studies show that certain thematic-clinical areas arouse greater interest among nursing students than others, which has repercussions on the job preferences of recent graduates. This produces inequalities in healthcare organisations, making it impossible to cover certain services. Aim: To identify the job preferences of nursing students at La Laguna University according to clinical subject areas once they have completed their degree studies. Method: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study with an analytical component. The study population consisted of 3rd and 4th year nursing students at La Laguna University. Different sociodemographic variables were collected, as well as questions about the students' job preferences. A descriptive analysis and an inferential analysis (Pearson's X2 test or Fisher's statistic for qualitative variables and the Student's t-test for the comparison of means for quantitative variables) were carried out using the IBM SPSS v19 statistical programme in order to explore the association between the different variables. Results: The total sample was 153 students (n=153). The response rate was 53.50%. The most preferred areas were Emergency and Urgent Nursing (Mean=3.04±1.05) and General Nursing (Mean=2.54±0.96), while the least favoured areas were "Other Areas (teaching-management-research)" (Mean=1.10±1.22) and Operating Room and Anaesthesia (Mean=1.58±1.23). Conclusions: Nursing students showed a greater willingness to work in some areas than others. It is necessary to generate new strategies in order to improve the attraction of nursing students to particular clinical areas. (AU)

Las experiencias de las matronas en el acompañamiento intraparto de mujeres con miedo al parto / The experiences of midwives in the intrapartum monitoring of women with fear of childbirth

Objetivo: El objetivo general del estudio fue describir las experiencias de las matronas en el acompañamiento a mujeres con miedo al parto (MAP). Método: Se planteó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal, donde la población a estudio fueron las matronas de la Unidad de Paritorio del Hospital Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante un cuestionario estructurado ad hoc que incluía variables sobre la experiencia profesional en el acompañamiento intraparto de mujeres con MAP. Resultados: Participaron un total de 83 matronas, que identificaron como factores más frecuentes relacionados con el MAP en la práctica clínica el miedo a las complicaciones del recién nacido (90,4 %), la solicitud de cesárea (77,1 %) y la solicitud precoz de analgesia epidural (88,0 %). Con el objetivo de disminuir la ansiedad o la posibilidad de experiencia traumática, todas las matronas (n= 84) intervienen conscientemente creando un espacio de paz y escucha activa. Las mujeres con MAP producen mayormente sentimientos de empatía (80,7 %) y compasión (41 %). El 64 % de las matronas se mostró totalmente de acuerdo con la afirmación «Guiar a mujeres con miedo al parto es un desafío interesante». Conclusiones: Los resultados de este estudio evidencian que las matronas que acompañan a las mujeres intraparto son sensibles a esta problemática y se muestran motivadas para su abordaje, detectando de manera subjetiva indicadores que las alertan de que la mujer pueda tener miedo, y que este MAP puede estar asociado a consecuencias adversas. Aunque en ciertas situaciones preguntan a la mujer por su MAP, los factores que las inducen a ello presentan mucha variabilidad. (AU)

Objective: The general objective of the study was to describe the experiences of midwives in accompanying women with fear of childbirth (FOC). Method: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was proposed, where the study population was the midwives of the delivery unit of the Maternal and Child Hospital of Gran Canaria. The data was obtained through a structured “ad hoc” questionnaire that included variables on professional experience in intrapartum monitoring of women with APM. Results: A total of 83 midwives participated, identifying fear of newborn complications (90.4%), request for cesarean section (77.1%), and early request for epidural analgesia (88.0%). In order to reduce anxiety or the possibility of a traumatic experience, all midwives (n=84) consciously intervene by creating a space for peace and active listening. Women with FOC produce more feelings of empathy (80.7%) and compassion (41%). 64% of midwives fully agreed with the statement “Guiding women with fear of childbirth is an interesting challenge”. Conclusions: The results of this study show that midwives who accompany intrapartum women are sensitive to this problem and are motivated to address it, subjectively detecting indicators that alert them that the woman may be afraid, and that this FOC may be associated with adverse consequences. Although in certain situations they ask the woman about her FOC, the factors that lead them to do so are highly variable. (AU)

Uso de terminología enfermera normalizada en los informes de cuidados al alta en un hospital de Canarias: Un estudio descriptivo / Use of standardised nursing terminology at discharge care reports in a canary islands hospital: a descriptive study

Objetivos: Analizar el uso de len guajes normalizados en los informes de enfermería identificando tipologías, eti quetas y contenidos diagnósticos. Méto do: Estudio descriptivo transversal sobre una muestra aleatoria simple (n = 370) de informes al alta hospitalaria en el Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insu lar Materno-Infantil (Islas Canarias, Es paña). Se han calculado media y desvia ción estándar para las variables cuantita tivas y frecuencias para las cualitativas usando SPSS® (versión 25). Resulta dos: Menos de la mitad de los informes (49,23%) incorporaron terminología nor malizada, incluyendo n = 1922 diagnósti cos activos, n = 93 diagnósticos resuel tos, n = 72 intervenciones y n = 103 re sultados enfermeros. Conclusiones: Los informes que usan lenguajes normaliza dos son insuficientes, mostrando elevado número de etiquetas diagnósticas que revelan escasa resolución de diagnósti cos focalizados en el problema, con me nor registro de intervenciones y resulta dos enfermeros (AU)

Objectives: To analyse the use of standardised language in nursing care reports identifying typologies, labels and diagnostic content. Methods: Cross-sec tional descriptive study of a simple ran dom sample (n = 370) in the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Ma terno-Infantil (Canary Islands, Spain). The mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequency for qualitative variables were calculated using SPSS® (version 25). Results: Less than half of the reports (49.23%) incorpo rated standardized terminology, including n = 1922 active diagnoses, n = 93 resol ved diagnoses, n = 72 interventions, and n = 103 nurses outcomes. Conclusions: Reports using standardized languages are insufficient, showing a high number of diagnostic labels that reveal poor reso lution of problem-focused nursing diag noses, with less recording of interven tions and nurses outcomes (AU)

Feelings of being a second victim among Spanish midwives and obstetricians.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of feelings of being a second victim among midwives and obstetricians in Spain and to explore possible differences between the two professions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive-analytical observational study. METHODS: An online survey collecting several variables was administered throughout the Spanish territory. Spanish version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) was used. The data collection period was from May to December 2020. RESULTS: A total sample of 719 obstetricians and midwives were studied. There were significant differences between the two groups with respect to seven dimensions of SVEST: greater feelings of being a second victim among obstetricians in the dimensions physical distress/p ≤ .001, non-work-related support/p ≤ .001 and absenteeism/p ≤ .001 and greater feelings of being a second victim among midwives in the dimensions psychological distress/p ≤ .001, supervisor support/p = .011, professional self-efficacy/p ≤ .001 and intention to change jobs/p ≤ .001.

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Fear of Childbirth Questionnaire (CFQ-e).

The fear of childbirth is a topical concern, yet the issue has barely been studied in Spain, and only one fear of childbirth measurement instrument has been validated in the country. The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and validate the Fear of Childbirth Questionnaire (CFQ) for use in Spain, as well as to describe and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of this instrument. In a first phase, a methodological study was carried out (translation-backtranslation and cross-cultural adaptation), and pilot study was carried out in the target population. In addition, content validation of the instrument was obtained (CFQ-e) from 10 experts. In the second phase, a cross-sectional study was carried out at several centres in Gran Canaria Island to obtain a validation sample. The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CFQ-e, including construct validity through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, the calculation of reliability via factor consistency using the ORION coefficients as well as alpha and omega coefficients were carried out. The CFQ-e showed evidence of content validity, adequate construct validity and reliability. The CFQ-e is composed of 37 items distributed in four subscales or dimensions: "fear of medical interventions"; "fear of harm and dying"; "fear of pain" and "fears relating to sexual aspects and embarrassment". The CFQ-e constitutes a valid and reliable tool to measure the fear of childbirth in the Spanish pregnant population.

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the validity and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-E) questionnaire. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study aimed at midwives and obstetricians in Spain. An online survey was conducted consisting of 2 parts: the first part collected different variables, and the second part collected the SVEST-E. The temporal stability of the instrument was evaluated using the test-retest method. For the construct validity and reliability, an exploratory factor analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were performed using FACTOR program v.10 with a polychoric correlation matrix. RESULTS: A total of 689 professionals participated in the study (323 obstetrician physicians/366 midwives). The mean (SD) score on the SVEST-E for the total sample was 3.09 (0.50). The parallel analysis of the exploratory factor analysis suggested a 5-factor solution, with a total explained variability of 61.8%. The goodness-of-fit indices of the model were the following: root mean square error of approximation = 0.038 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.031-0.042) and comparative fit index = 0.989 (95% CI, 0.988-0.992). The factor model obtained was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, obtaining the values of root mean square error of approximation = 0.038 (95% CI, 0.026-0.053) and comparative fit index = 0.989 (95% CI, 0.969-1.000). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The SVEST-E instrument maintains the same items as the original questionnaire but introduces changes in the organization of its dimensions. The Spanish version maintains adequate construct validity, reliability, and temporal stability, so it is a valid tool to evaluate the second victim experience in Spanish health professionals.

Incidencia de úlceras por presión en una unidad geriátrica de recuperación funcional: estudio de series cronológicas / The incidence of pressure ulcers at a geriatric functional recovery unit: a time series study

Objetivos: Describir y analizar la incidencia de úlceras por presión (UPP) en una unidad geriátrica de recuperación funcional de un hospital geriátrico y examinar los posibles factores de riesgo. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de dos series cronológicas de incidencia de UPP en la unidad geriátrica, de media estancia o convalecencia. Conformaron las dos series todos los pacientes ingresados consecutivamente en los dos periodos de estudio (n = 241). Se consideró UPP incidente o intrahospitalaria aquella que se produjo a partir de las 48 horas desde el ingreso (fórmula de cálculo: Pacientes que han desarrollado una UPP en el hospital × 100/ pacientes ingresados más de 2 días). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las variables recogidas y comparaciones mediante la prueba de la χ2 o el test exacto de Fisher, según correspondiera. Resultados: La incidencia acumulada para el primer periodo fue del 23%, IC 95% = 15,8-31,4 y en el segundo, del 23,5%, IC 95% = 15,9-31,2; no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas. Se obtuvo una tasa de incidencia de 3,4 por 1000 pacientes/día en el primer periodo y de 4,6 por 1000 pacientes/ día en el segundo, lo que supone una razón de tasas de 0,857, IC 95% = 0,49-1,5. No hubo diferencias en el RR de desarrollar UPP en función del periodo por cada variable, a excepción del diagnóstico de problemas musculoesqueléticos donde los pacientes con este problema en el segundo grupo tuvieron un riesgo relativo (RR) = 3,3, IC 95% = 1,1-10,9. Conclusiones: Este estudio ha permitido determinar la incidencia de UPP y sus factores de riesgo en una unidad de recuperación funcional de un hospital geriátrico, resultado epidemiológico apenas identificado en la literatura y de gran importancia para poder abordar mejoras en la calidad del cuidado del paciente anciano (AU)

Objectives: To describe and analyze the incidence of pressure ulcers (PU) at the geriatric functional recovery unit of a geriatric hospital, along with the possible risk factors. Methods: a retrospective time series study conducted at a mid-stay or convalescence geriatric unit to examine the incidence of PU. Two study periods were examined between 2012 and 2013. The data comprised all patients consecutively admitted during both study periods, n=241. The occurrence of a PU or hospital-acquired pressure ulcer was considered as a lesion that occurred > 48 hours after admission (the formula used for calculation was: patients who have developed a PU at the hospital × 100 / patients admitted for more than two days). A descriptive analysis was performed of the gathered variables and these were compared using the Chi-Squared test or the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Results: the accumulated incidence for the first study period was 23%, 95% CI=15.8-31.4, whereas during the second period this was 23.5%, 95% CI=15.9-31.2. No statistically significant differences were found. An incidence rate of 3.4 per 1,000 patients / day was obtained during the first period and of 4.6 per 1,000 patients / day during the second period, equaling a rate of 0.857, 95% CI=0.49-1.5. There were no differences in the RR of developing PU according to the period for each variable, with the exception of the diagnosis of muscle-skeletal problems; patients in the second group who had this ailment obtained a RR of 3.3, 95% CI=1.1-10.9. conclusions: This study has enabled us to determine the incidence of PU and their risk factors at the functional recovery unit of a geriatric hospital. To date, there is scarce epidemiological data on this population. However, further studies on this topic are necessary in order to continue improving the quality of care for older patients (AU)

Cross-cultural adaptation to the Spanish context and evaluation of the content validity of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-E) questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: To carry out a cross-cultural adaptation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) questionnaire to the Spanish context, and to evaluate its content validity (CVI). METHODS: The translation and cultural adaptation of a measuring instrument by means of translation and back translation conducted through the participation of 20 health professionals. The content validation was carried out through the participation of 10 experts. The content validity of each item (CVI-I), the content validity index per expert (CVI-E) and the content validity total (CVI-T) were calculated for the questionnaire. Corrections were carried out for probable random agreement and the statistical calculation Kappa (K*) modified for each item of the instrument. RESULTS: The final instrument obtained (SVEST-E) has a CVI-Total of 0.87 and consists of 36 total items, subdivided into 7 dimensions, 2 outcome variables and a support option section maintaining the same structure as the original questionnaire. Thirty items had a CVI-I with values over ≥°0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The SVEST-E questionnaire is an equivalent of the original and is an instrument that could help to evaluate the second victim experiences of healthcare professionals in our country. It is an instrument with adequate content validity to measure the experience of second victims in health professionals in our country.

Analgesia epidural: actitud y calidad percibida por las puérperas en el Hospital Universitario Materno Infantil de Canarias / Epidural analgesia: attitude and quality perceived by puerperal women at the Hospital Universitario Materno Infantil de Canarias

Objetivo: Identificar las actitudes y la calidad subjetiva percibida por las mujeres después del uso de analgesia epidural en el parto. Metodología: Estudio transversal, observacional, descriptivo y analítico realizado en el Hospital Universitario Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, donde la población de estudio fueron las puérperas que recibieron analgesia epidural durante el parto entre agosto y octubre de 2019. Se utilizaron un muestreo consecutivo no probabilístico y un cuestionario autoadministrado. Se realizaron un análisis descriptivo de las variables y un análisis inferencial para explorar la asociación entre diferentes variables. Resultados: La muestra final estuvo constituida por 354 mujeres. Las mujeres consideraron que la información recibida por las matronas era la más importante (57,6%), y el 20,3% percibió un retraso en la administración de analgesia epidural después de su solicitud. Se obtuvo una puntuación media respecto a la satisfacción global materna de 24,45 (desviación estándar= 4,97; máxima 28; mínima 0). Se encontró una relación estadísticamente significativa entre la satisfacción global y el nivel educativo (p= 0,019*), y entre la lectura y el entendimiento previo del consentimiento informado y la satisfacción global materna (p <0,001*). La percepción de demora en la administración influye de forma negativa en la satisfacción (p= 0,003*). Conclusiones: Un número elevado de mujeres que inicialmente no se planteaban la analgesia epidural en el parto acabó optando por ella, con un nivel alto de satisfacción y calidad percibida después de su uso. (AU)

Objective: To identify labouring women’s attitudes and subjective quality after the use of epidural analgesia. Methodology: Observational, descriptive analytical cross-sectional study at the Mother and Children’s University Hospital of Gran Canaria, with a study population of postnatal women who received epidural analgesia during delivery between August and October 2019. A non-probabilistic consecutive sample and a self-administered questionnaire were used. A descriptive analysis of the collected variables and an inferential analysis was performed to explore the association between different variables. Results: From a sample of 354 women. Women considered the information received by midwives more important (57.6%) and 20.3% perceived a delay in the administration of epidural analgesia after their request. An average score of 24,45 regarding maternal global satisfaction was obtained (SD= 4.97; maximum 28; minimum 0). A statistically significant relationship was found between global satisfaction and educational level (p= 0.019*) and between reading and prior understanding of informed consent and overall maternal satisfaction (p <0.001*). Delay perception in the administration of the epidural negatively influenced satisfaction (p= 0.003*). Conclusions: A high number of women who initially did not consider epidural analgesia in childbirth end up opting for it, the level of satisfaction and quality perceived after its use being high. (AU)

Cross-cultural adaptation to the Spanish context and evaluation of the content validity of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-E) questionnaire. / Adaptación transcultural al contexto español y evaluación de la validez de contenido del cuestionario Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-E).

OBJECTIVES: To carry out a cross-cultural adaptation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) questionnaire to the Spanish context, and to evaluate its content validity (CVI). METHODS: The translation and cultural adaptation of a measuring instrument by means of translation and back translation conducted through the participation of 20 health professionals. The content validation was carried out through the participation of 10 experts. The content validity of each item (CVI-I), the content validity index per expert (CVI-E) and the content validity total (CVI-T) were calculated for the questionnaire. Corrections were carried out for probable random agreement and the statistical calculation Kappa (K*) modified for each item of the instrument. RESULTS: The final instrument obtained (SVEST-E) has a CVI-Total of 0.87 and consists of 36 total items, subdivided into 7 dimensions, 2 outcome variables and a support option section maintaining the same structure as the original questionnaire. Thirty items had a CVI-I with values over ≥̊0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The SVEST-E questionnaire is an equivalent of the original and is an instrument that could help to evaluate the second victim experiences of healthcare professionals in our country. It is an instrument with adequate content validity to measure the experience of second victims in health professionals in our country.

Satisfacción percibida por las mujeres durante el parto en el Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil de Canarias a través del Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E) / Perceived satisfaction of women during labour at the Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil of the Canary Islands through the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E)

OBJETIVO: Conocer el grado de satisfacción de las mujeres tras el parto en el Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria (HUMIC) y establecer posibles relaciones entre el grado de satisfacción y las variables estudiadas. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional descriptivo de corte transversal con componente analítico. La población a estudio fueron las mujeres cuyo parto tuvo lugar en el mes de noviembre del 2018 en el HUMIC reclutadas mediante muestreo no probabilístico de tipo consecutivo. Se utilizó el cuestionario Childbirth Experience Questionnaire en su versión española (CEQ-E) (cuestionario con 4 dominios: capacidad propia, apoyo profesional, seguridad percibida y participación/modelo de análisis 2). En una primera fase se realizó un análisis descriptivo y en una segunda, un análisis inferencial para explorar la asociación entre diferentes variables. RESULTADOS: La muestra total fue de 257 mujeres (n=257). La puntuación total con el CEQ-E fue de 3,24 (DE 0,37 puntos). No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la puntuación final del CEQ-E entre las mujeres con parto espontáneo frente a inducciones-estimulaciones (p = 0,563) ni entre mujeres primíparas frente a multíparas (p = 0,060).Las mujeres cuyo parto había sido menor o igual a 12 h (p = 0,024), sin traumatismo perineal (p = 0,021) y aquellas a las que no se les ha realizado episiotomía (p = 0,002) obtuvieron mejor puntuación final en el CEQ-E. El parto instrumental (fórceps) frente al parto eutócico se asocia a puntuaciones menores respecto a la puntuación final en el CEQ-E (p≤0,001). CONCLUSIONES: La satisfacción global de la gestante tras el parto en el HUMIC es alta. El parto instrumental parece asociarse a menor satisfacción percibida. Aspectos como el miedo y el cansancio en el parto pueden influir negativamente en la satisfacción. Estos aspectos son susceptibles de mejora mediante el establecimiento de estrategias que ayuden a mayor bienestar y minimicen el miedo de las gestantes en su parto

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of satisfaction of women after childbirth at the Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil of Gran Canaria (HUMIC) and to establish possible relationships between the degree of satisfaction and the variables studied. METHOD: A cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with an analytical component. The study population comprised women who gave birth at the HUMIC in November 2018, recruited through consecutive non-probabilistic sampling. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E) was used (questionnaire with 4 domains: own capacity', professional support, perceived safety and participation/analytical model 2). In a first phase a descriptive analysis was made, and in a second phase an inferential analysis to explore the association between different variables. RESULTS: The total sample comprised 257 women (n=257). The total score using the CEQ was 3.24 (SD .37 points). No statistically significant differences were found in the final CEQ score between the women who had a spontaneous delivery versus induction-stimulation (P=.563) or between primiparous versus multiparous women (P=.060). The women whose labour lasted 12hours or less (P=.024), without perineal trauma (P=.021) and those who had not undergone episiotomy (P=.002) achieved a better final CEQ score. Instrumental delivery (forceps) versus normal delivery is associated with lower scores with respect to the final CEQ-E score (P=≤.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women's overall satisfaction after delivery in HUMIC was high. Instrumental delivery seems to be associated with lower perceived satisfaction. Aspects such as fear and fatigue in labour could affect satisfaction negatively. These aspects can be improved by establishing strategies to increase comfort and minimise pregnant women's fear of labour

Perceived satisfaction of women during labour at the Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil of the Canary Islands through the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E). / Satisfacción percibida por las mujeres durante el parto en el Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil de Canarias a través del Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of satisfaction of women after childbirth at the Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil of Gran Canaria (HUMIC) and to establish possible relationships between the degree of satisfaction and the variables studied. METHOD: A cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study with an analytical component. The study population comprised women who gave birth at the HUMIC in November 2018, recruited through consecutive non-probabilistic sampling. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E) was used (questionnaire with 4 domains: own capacity', professional support, perceived safety and participation/analytical model 2). In a first phase a descriptive analysis was made, and in a second phase an inferential analysis to explore the association between different variables. RESULTS: The total sample comprised 257 women (n=257). The total score using the CEQ was 3.24 (SD .37 points). No statistically significant differences were found in the final CEQ score between the women who had a spontaneous delivery versus induction-stimulation (P=.563) or between primiparous versus multiparous women (P=.060). The women whose labour lasted 12hours or less (P=.024), without perineal trauma (P=.021) and those who had not undergone episiotomy (P=.002) achieved a better final CEQ score. Instrumental delivery (forceps) versus normal delivery is associated with lower scores with respect to the final CEQ-E score (P=≤.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women's overall satisfaction after delivery in HUMIC was high. Instrumental delivery seems to be associated with lower perceived satisfaction. Aspects such as fear and fatigue in labour could affect satisfaction negatively. These aspects can be improved by establishing strategies to increase comfort and minimise pregnant women's fear of labour.